440. Can Capitalism Exist Without Hate? Racism, Sexism, Homophobia, Etc.

I hate to be the person who sits here and says capitalism is the root of all evil, but… the more I channel, the more I’m leaning toward this conclusion.

Capitalism is essentially a “yolo” philosophy when it comes to business, money and economy. Any and every person theoretically, hypothetically can make as much money as they want/please. We of course, understand that there are constraints and limits to the ease in which people do this. This may be for a monopoly on resources, hate or discrimination upon yourself and others, as well as financial capability and ability to get started. There are certainly “easier” ways to get ahead. However… we are hyper-aware of success stories. Some of the richest people alive and passed have had extremely humble beginnings. Like I said… anything is possible. But for the sake of this article, it’s important to note that capitalism is inherently autonomous. Wie of course, you may need a team of people and vendors and so on to fulfill your mission… We’re all familiar with owner and CEO “status”. This is certainly a very different structure than socialism, communism, etc. On one hand, the ideal freedom and opportunity is positive. But is it true that capitalism was simply worked around a sociological structure which profited off of hate? Perhaps.

Before we move on, it’s important to now and understand the importance of a power structure in our lives. Perhaps… I don’t even need to explain. But what’s notable is that economic systems and power structures are not just physical. They are mental and emotional as well. In other words… they act as a “matrix” of sorts which produce information, knowledge and executions which shift and change the way we think. Often times in capitalism… it’s not for the better. We’re often times “crushed” and “overwhelmed’ by the distinct and notable warped power structure of capitalism. In other words… even ifw e, as humans, have a sense fo hope, faith and optimism that we too, will receive a fantasy of “riches” ever-so displayed by capitalism, there’s no lack of intense programming which tells us that it’s not realistic… at all. That combined with the current funnel of power, resources and finances existing within our capitalistic structure which is completely uneven and one-sided. Think of it as energetic inertia. As of right now, the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Without a serious break or catastrophic interruption in this flow, this problem will likely suffer exponential and drastic ramifications and effects. We typically, as a collective, cannot stop or disrupt energy in motion, easily. Capitalism is… in a way… the ultimate gaslight-er and manipulator. It exists, but it’s a fallacy of a structure. Meaning that you cannot touch or experience capitalism. However, we thoroughly think differently, as every single day we are unintentionally affected by it. But for all intents and purposes… capitalism is matrix. It’s not real. We’ve all just conditioned ourselves into believing that we are within this structure. It gets kind of meta, to be honest. Everyday, we simply act as though we are in a capitalistic society. We’re all for some reason… on board. Perhaps it’s lack of distrust and denial. Perhaps at the end of the day… we do truly believe it can and will be us. And that keeps us fueled and working within this system.

Let’s discuss chicken or the egg: Capitalism or hate. While I’m not a historian and it would be difficult for me to know or understand when capitalism truly energetically incepted or when it took its most intense grip of us/on us, there’s no chance (in my opinion) it perpetuated this long on accident. With the leaders of our currently perceived nation being white, there’s no doubt that they configured or perpetuated a system which would inevitably benefit them. Considering it’s unlikely they would intentionally or even unintentionally lose or “give away” power, it’s also likely that our power dynamics and systems continued to evolve to benefit who was in power. Which would be… white, heterosexual men. To be clear… as a channeler, I work for the entirety of the collective. Every single person, even those who are what we would perceive to be “evil”. So my bias is essentially, not a bias. It’s more from a factual and observational perspective. In this scenario, besides a select few, everyone is equally brainwashed.

Whichever came first, it’s noted that they are truly intertwined. But can I prove it’s more than conspiracy? Let’s look at the dynamics of an autonomous system.

In an autonomous power/control system, one must retain power and control. Continue to grow. At different points and places in time, there were different qualifications which allowed people to be “in charge”, so to speak. But at the current moment, it’s primarily influence, perhaps talent, and financial means. Consider that, throughout other times and moments in history, our values were a bit different, meaning that these qualifications may have been also different. Breaking down these different parts, talent is of course… inherent. However, talent is often times (not always) spearheaded by that of money or resources. In terms of influence, again, this is also often times encouraged by finances. And of course lastly we get to finances themselves. While, ideally, the flow of money that we receive and create for ourselves is through morally sound ways, often times gaining money is through the exploitation of resources, including people, places and things. There’s an inherent energetic power which acts as this almost… as cloud enveloping energies surrounding it. Either the energies default, escape or remove itself from the larger cloud, in other words, releasing energetic connections and moving into its own “sphere” which can be positive or negative. Negatively, these energies can and will remove or release connections and allies. Positively, of course, they are no longer at will of energies in charge. Or… energies can succumb to the larer energy or energies at play. In a way, surrendering to them, aligning to them, or otherwise. Can there be a surrender while still maintaining autonomy? I suppose so.

It’s also important to bring up the idea of finite abundances. The general consensus under capitalism is a fallacy that energy is finite. Power is finite. Meaning that if one person has “all the power”, others cannot. But this is simply untrue, as energy is constantly and consistently being generated. The same goes for money. But there’s a little bit of fear in all of us that this isn’t true, and that we are in a mode of scarcity. This is typically due to experiencing pains or traumas related to loss and/or scarcity of some kind. In an autonomous structure, it emphasizes this rhetoric, because we have people taking positions of power, opportunities, spotlights and more, which are inherently “one-of-a-kind”. Meaning that for those who did not receive or experience these tings, we understand it as “finite”. But the truth is, every single physical experience that we have is one-of-a-kind. We can always replicate energetic experiences. Therefore, there’s no need to fall into this fallacy. Regardless… autonomous systems are incredibly ego-centric. If someone has something I don’t… I need it. If someone has more power, I don’t have it. Things of that nature. It’s me or you versus the world. There is little to no cohesion. And any cohesion is simply working or branches of you and your own energy. There’s an inherent lack of balance.

So how does this all this fit into hate?

The concept or idea of hate is quite broad. And to be honest… I don’t typically like to use hate as a word, as I find that hate is a channeled execution of fear. If we think about it… there’s no inherent reason to hate others, unless we are/were in an autonomous system where we must win, succeed and beat others in order to exist, survive and have our needs met. It’s inherently competitive. Is competition a good thing? Yes, when it comes to the more “external” elements or parts of our existence such as spirituality. Not so much when it comes to our physical survival. As we are in a physical, dense, matrixed experience, this is our first “requirement” for living. So if we cannot make these ends meet, our ability to shift/change and control our energetic trajectory, narrative, purpose and intention for modifying the collective is limited. In a way, there may be a subconscious intention from those in power to keep many in poverty, as when the entire collective has energetic power, it tends to make decisions which are better for the entirety of the collective. Meaning that one or a couple of people being in control… does not fit this bill. Therefore, people’s fallacy of their own power is questioned and challenged. It’s incredibly important that in a state of this fallacy, the collective is controlled.

Back to “hate”. Fear it simply a vibration. Fear is not categorized. It does not have a concept or a theme… unless it does. In other words, fear can take on any single form, because fear is not a thing, it’s simply the contrasting element to a vibration. Anything that exists can be made into fear, in other words. Fear, oddly enough, in a very weird way, can and will be a fallacy. Meaning that fear cannot be quantified. It’s simply the perception of the channeler. Fear does not exist unless our perception value exists. Which is kind of weird. And it means that hate doesn’t exist unless our perception value exists. Meaning that hypothetically, we can shift our perception value tomorrow and eliminate hate.

Nevertheless, because fear is so incredibly broad, and on top of that, it’s so interestingly varied (in other words, every single person’s fear is slightly different), and is formulated through their very distinct prism. While there are some overarching fears (for example, fear of loneliness). The way this was formed within a person’s psyche was based on an experience which was not only so incredibly personal to them, but can never and will never be replicated in the exact same way.

So we must ask ourselves… in what way can those in power double up on their ways in which they retain it? Is it possible for those in power to not only take advantage of the fallacy of finite abundance, but to also ensure that the collective is thinking, acting and behaving in their favor? Yes, and it’s through measures in which those in power use those with hate as “pawns” in order to relinquish their control through hating others. If we think about it, hating others is inherently illogical. There is no logical reason as to why someone would hate another person. In this lifetime, you want to retain as many loyalties and alliances as possible. Biologically… it’s smart. It’s of course smart to keep your circle strong and refine, but to have somebody due to their authentic self is simply… against your best interests. This is where manipulation and control of hate comes in. If a powerful or political figure can warp and twist your fear to hate another person… they can not only come up with the “resolution” to these problems and issues, but they act as the “savior” in this scenario, even though they masked as the antagonist the entire time. It’s a bizarre game that some play. Again… particularly in politics.

It’s quite clear how this ended in the Trump election. While of course… at first… this fear and hate “won” at first, fear and hate do not have an energetic backing. I do believe this is particularly why the Trump administration was not able to execute their promises related to said hate and fear. That and of course… perhaps the inability to do something so not practical or perhaps what they never intended to do in the first place.

The fear that we have, and the hate that we project often times does not have a clear and logical enemy. But if those in power can promise us delivery from the responsibility of facing it, we will always keep those in power… in power. Because we’ve relinquished ours to them.

How to resolve this? Coming soon.