74. War From A Spiritual Perspective
It’s hard to imagine a purpose for war. Although there must be, considering how many wars have taken place over time. This will be from a high level intentional perspective, as each and every circumstance and situation is different, and there’s no way to capture the true devastation that war creates. I am for obvious reasons against war, and acknowledge that I do not have the information and resources to speak on behalf of every circumstance and situation. This is simply talking about war from a spiritual perspective.
If we imagine that every country or every area of a country for that matter is like an energetic ball bouncing into others (although we are relatively stationary, despite lunar transits as well as people from said countries traveling).
So when I speak about energetic balls, this would referring to a country or a part of a country. And although this is the intention, you can start a war with anyone or anything. A war can be two people. It can be two parts of yourself, as well.
Each and every ball is quite different. Some are bouncing more heavily into others, while others are relatively motionless. Let’s consider why an energetic ball may be stationary.
When an energetic ball sustains itself, it sort of lives on its own happily. It may co-create with other energetic balls. Perhaps occasionally bouncing into others, or maybe shifting positions. But it lights up its own self. It just bounces up and down in its own energy.
When an energetic ball is not able to sustain itself, it becomes rapidly more chaotic. It starts bouncing into other balls to gain their energy from them. It’s similar to how a person who is self-sustaining is relatively receptive and can “stand up” on their own, while others who are not are often times sporadic, chaotic, and can be pushed down by a slight inconvenience.
Essentially the two concepts are sustained and not sustained.
So what happens when this ball bounces into others? It causes mass tension and friction. The other balls are kind of like… why are you doing this. And it’s not only taking their energy and resources, but it’s making them unsustainable as well.
So there are ultimately two outcomes. Either both energetic balls are incredibly drained and ultimately separate, therefore the war simply aggravates both parties and leaves both with even less resources. Or one ball “overtakes” the other and through more of an energetic symbiotic process, both energies ultimately even out to create an entirely new vibration. That vibration will likely depend on precise circumstances and both parties, but it’s a relatively cohesive whole, regardless.
Now you may wonder, do energetic balls attempt to overtake other energetic balls when they are stable? The answer is no. There’s just no reason to, because there’s absolutely no use. An imbalanced energetic transaction will leave both parties ultimately unstable, no matter what. The goal is of course on the unstable party’s end to gain more stability, but it’s ultimately a risk.
So what happens to these balls if they “fail” in their conquer? They’re essentially forced to retreat back and do this self-sustaining reflection work. They have no choice. It ultimately helps (in my opinion) build a better energetic force. The conquer is simply temporary. While theoretically war without any conquering seems incredibly useless, it’s ultimately one of the best case scenarios.
But is that always the case? Is it always better to not conquer? The answer is vague. Part of me feels it’s a part of life and our journey here. The other part feels that in a perfect world, it’s incredibly unnecessary. Perhaps this is the incarnation process we asked for. So therefore it must “be”.
Conceptually, the concept of “conquering” is ultimately a fallacy, as our claim on others is nothing but a physical idea. We can enforce others to live a certain way. We can rob them of their resources. But we can never force people to truly be the way we want them to.
Since we are ultimately all from the same consciousness, the concept of conquer is… ultimately meaningless. It’s a fallacy. The focus should be on self-sustaining rather than an attempt to overcompensate or hide this fact. Strength comes from within, and not a desperate attempt outward.
So the question is, if one ball is under attack, does another ball come in to help? It’s an interesting question, and perhaps more complicated than the actual intention for this war. By doing so, there’s a risk of added instability. The ultimate issue is that there isn’t a resolve of the aggressor orb, it’s kind of a temporary fix. Theoretically, the best solve from a spiritual perspective would be to re-stabilize the destabilized aggressor orb. However it’s ultimately always the exact opposite approach we take from a physical perspective.
Everything is ultimately a risk. There’s ultimately no “right” answer, as that will be based on the current situation and the intuition of all parties involved. If war is based in energy, does that theoretically mean that every aspect of consciousness is indirectly involved? The answer is kind of, but more so “close” partners to the affected parties, whether that be physical or mental. Like in the example, if an energetic ball is causing chaos, it’s likely only bumping into the other energetic balls near it. But those ramifications can certainly spread out to affect more than what’s seen.
At the end of the day, the self sustaining balls win. Not the ones who have gathered more balls.
And conquering is a fallacy. No matter what you may think you can do, you can never make people truly feel or believe what you want them to believe. You may be able to force them to pretend, but you can never get validation in any physical, mental or emotional way. All of that comes from within. Or at least within the ball.
